Modal sosial dan kearifan lokal sebagai sumber inovasi pada umkm perempuan: Sebuah systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60036/c220d934Keywords:
Modal Sosial, Kearifan Lokal, Inovasi, UMKM Perempuan, Kewirausahaan Perempuan, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran modal sosial dan kearifan lokal sebagai sumber inovasi pada UMKM perempuan. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan Systematic Literature Review (SLR) dengan protokol PRISMA 2020. Pencarian dilakukan pada Scopus, ScienceDirect, dan Google Scholar untuk publikasi 2020–2026; dari 50 artikel yang teridentifikasi, 8 artikel memenuhi kriteria inklusi dan dianalisis menggunakan thematic analysis enam tahap Braun dan Clarke (2006). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa modal sosial berperan sebagai sumber akses terhadap informasi, pengetahuan, kolaborasi, dan dukungan komunitas yang mendorong munculnya inovasi pada UMKM perempuan, sementara kearifan lokal berfungsi sebagai sumber diferensiasi melalui pemanfaatan pengetahuan tradisional, nilai budaya, serta sumber daya lokal dalam penciptaan produk, proses, dan model bisnis baru. Sintesis penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keduanya memiliki hubungan yang saling melengkapi, di mana modal sosial menjadi mekanisme yang memungkinkan pertukaran dan pengembangan pengetahuan lokal menjadi inovasi bernilai ekonomi.
References
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Ray, C. (1998). Culture, intellectual property and territorial rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 38(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00060
Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Harvard University Press.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Warren, D. M., Slikkerveer, L. J., & Brokensha, D. (Eds.). (1995). The cultural dimension of development: Indigenous knowledge systems. Intermediate Technology Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Milastri Muzakkar (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
