Factors influencing audit quality: A systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60036/7rbh4p08Keywords:
Audit Quality, Auditor Independence, Big 4, Audit Committee, Audit Tenure, Corporate Governance, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
This systematic literature review synthesizes empirical research on factors influencing audit quality, examining studies published between 2019 and 2024. The review aims to identify key determinants of audit quality and their relative importance across different contexts. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, this review analyzed 92 peer-reviewed articles from Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Studies were categorized based on factor type: auditor-level factors, audit firm-level factors, and external/contextual factors. The review identifies auditor independence, Big 4 affiliation, audit committee effectiveness, and audit tenure as the most consistently studied factors. Big 4 auditors generally demonstrate higher audit quality, though this effect is moderated by client characteristics. Audit committee financial expertise positively influences audit quality through enhanced oversight. Time budget pressure and low audit fees negatively affect audit quality. Emerging themes include the impact of technology adoption and regulatory changes on audit quality. This review provides a comprehensive framework integrating input, process, and output factors affecting audit quality. It offers practical implications for regulators, audit firms, and corporate governance stakeholders while identifying gaps for future research.
References
Al-Najjar, B. (2018). Corporate governance and audit features: SMEs evidence. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(1), 163-179.
Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1-24.
Christensen, B. E., Glover, S. M., Omer, T. C., & Shelley, M. K. (2016). Understanding audit quality: Insights from audit professionals and investors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4), 1648-1684.
DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183-199.
DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275-326.
DeFond, M., Erkens, D. H., & Zhang, J. (2017). Do client characteristics really drive the Big N audit quality effect? New evidence from propensity score matching. Management Science, 63(11), 3628-3649.
Eshleman, J. D., & Guo, P. (2014). Do Big 4 auditors provide higher audit quality after controlling for the endogenous choice of auditor? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(4), 197-219.
Ettredge, M., Fuerherm, E. E., & Li, C. (2014). Fee pressure and audit quality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(4), 247-263.
Fitriany, F., Utama, S., Martani, D., & Rosietta, H. (2016). Pengaruh tenure, rotasi dan spesialisasi kantor akuntan publik (KAP) terhadap kualitas audit. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 17(2), 85-94.
Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 36(4), 345-368.
Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125-152.
Ghafran, C., & O’Sullivan, N. (2013). The governance role of audit committees: Reviewing a decade of evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(4), 381-407.
Hwang, S., & Hong, P. K. (2022). Auditors’ workload and audit quality under audit hour budget pressure. International Journal of Auditing, 26(3), 371-387.
Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. K. (2004). Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus non-Big 4 audits. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 473-495.
Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L. B., & Velury, U. K. (2013). Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 385-421.
Lawrence, A., Minutti-Meza, M., & Zhang, P. (2011). Can Big 4 versus non-Big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics? The Accounting Review, 86(1), 259-286.
Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
Pangaribuan, H. (2024). The audit quality: A systematic review of key factors and future directions. International Scholars Conference, 11(3), 977-995.
Velte, P. (2017). The link between audit committees, corporate governance quality and firm performance: A literature review. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4), 15-31.
Zaman, M., Hudaib, M., & Haniffa, R. (2011). Corporate governance quality, audit fees and non-audit services fees. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 38(1-2), 165-197.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Angel II P. Esmeralda (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
