Performance Analysis of PT PNM Tangerang Branch Using Balanced Scorecard
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60036/0eb7v303Keywords:
Performance, Balanced Scorecard, PNMAbstract
This study analyzes the performance of PT PNM Tangerang Branch using the Balanced Scorecard method across four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business processes, and learning and growth. A quantitative approach was employed, utilizing both primary and secondary data. Primary data were collected from employees and customers of PT PNM Tangerang Branch through surveys, while secondary data were obtained from financial reports, relevant books, journals, and previous studies. The findings reveal that the internal business process perspective performs well, though improvement is needed in the dissemination of financing programs. The customer perspective demonstrates satisfactory performance. The learning and growth perspective shows positive results, but employee workload requires evaluation due to the perceived high burden. However, the financial perspective indicates poor performance, as the company has failed to generate profit for three consecutive years, primarily due to high operational costs. These results suggest that while non-financial dimensions are relatively strong, financial sustainability requires immediate strategic intervention to reduce operational expenses and improve profitability.
References
Aditiyo, M. (2012) Evaluasi Penerapan Balanced Scorecard Sebagai Sistem Pengukuran Organis asi. Jurnal Program Magister Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2(3).
Fadliansyah, R., Irawan, I, & Dewi, D. N. (2025). Pengukuran Kinerja Usaha Menggunakan Metode Balanced Scorecard:(Studi Kasus Pada CV XYZ). Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen,4(1),111-126.
Hansen & Mowen. (2004). Management Accounting. Jakarta: Salemba.
Hardiansyah. (2021). Komunikasi pelayanan public konsep dan aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Gava M edia.
Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (2019). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In Corporate governance,77-132.
Kaplan, R.S., & Norton, D. P. (2000). Linking The Balanced Scorecard into Strategy.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Laelasar, S., Wazdi, A. I., Guntara, Y., & Suryopratomo, A. (2023). Pengaruh Balanced Scorec ard terhadap kinerja manajemen di BPRS PNM Mentari Garut. Jurnal Dimamu, 2(3), 304-314.
Mulyadi. (2011). Balanced Scorecard; Alat Manajemen Kontemporer Untuk Pelipatgandakan Kinerja laporan Keuangan Perusahaan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Purwadhi, P., Widjaja, Y. R., Lukas, D. C., & Hapa, M. (2025). Implementasi Balanced Scor ecard sebagai Alat Pengukuran Kinerja di Rumah Sakit: Systematic Literature Revie w. EKOMA: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi, 4(2),3548-3556.
Rasyid, M., Manalu, D. N., & Hidayat, S. (2025). Validasi Instrumen Evaluasi Kinerja di PT DUN KIN DONUT dengan Menggunakan Metode Balance ScoreCard.Jurnal Manajemen d an Ekonomi Kreatif,275-285.
Samosir, R.T., & Safitri, C. E. (2024). Implementasi Balanced Scorecard dalam penilaian kinerj a perbankan syariah di Indonesia. Paulus Journal of Accounting (PJA),5(2).
Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Eben Simare Mare, Eduardus Suharto (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
